Politics

Syria avoiding chemical weapons questions


Western nations have accused Syria of refusing for eight years to clear up 20 outstanding issues about its undeclared research, production and possible weaponisation of unknown quantities of chemical weapons.

US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield told the UN Security Council the world “should not be fooled by Syria’s veneer of co-operation” while it deliberately delays and obstructs answers to the international chemical weapons watchdog.

France’s UN Ambassador Nicolas De Riviere went further, saying Syria is not only not co-operating with the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons but it has continued to use chemical weapons.

“And these facts must be qualified as crimes against humanity,” he said.

Syria joined the Chemical Weapons Convention in September 2013, pressed by its close ally Russia after a deadly chemical weapons attack that the West blamed on Damascus.

A Security Council resolution adopted at that time endorsed the decision of the OPCW, which implements the convention, to destroy Syria’s chemical weapons program and banned Syria’s use, development, production or acquisition of chemical weapons.

By August 2014, Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government declared that the destruction of its chemical weapons was complete, but Syria’s initial declaration of its chemical stockpiles and chemical weapons production sites to the OPCW has remained in dispute.

UN disarmament chief Izumi Nakamitsu told the council on Wednesday that 20 of the 24 outstanding issues in the declaration opened by the OPCW in 2014 remain unresolved.

They not only include the undeclared production and possible weaponisation of toxic chemicals but the unknown whereabouts of significant quantities of chemical warfare agents and munitions.

Nakamitsu said the OPCW also has not received a requested declaration on undeclared nerve agents produced at a former chemical weapons facility that Syria declared “as never having been used to produce and/or weaponise chemical warfare agents”, and other requested information.

She called on Syria to respond to the organisation’s requests “as soon as possible” and to allow all members of its team analysing the declaration “unfettered access”, citing the government’s refusal to grant a visa to one member.

Last June, OPCW chief Fernando Arias told the council its experts investigated 77 allegations against Syria and concluded that in 17 cases chemical weapons were likely or definitely used.

He called it “a disturbing reality” that eight years after Syria joined the Chemical Weapons Convention, many questions remain about its initial declaration of its weapons, stockpiles and precursors, and its ongoing program.

In April 2020, OPCW investigators blamed three chemical attacks in 2017 on the Syrian government, which it has vehemently denied.

The OPCW Executive Council responded by demanding Syria provide details.

When it did not, France submitted a draft measure on behalf of 46 countries in November 2020 to suspend Syria’s “rights and privileges” in the global watchdog.

In an unprecedented vote on April 21, 2021 the OPCW suspended Syria’s rights until all outstanding issues are resolved.

Nakamitsu said on Wednesday that Syria has not completed any of the measures required by the OPCW for reinstatement.

Syria’s UN Ambassador Bassam Sabbagh told the council his government “rejects any attempt to question the Syrian declaration and serious co-operation with the OPCW and its technical secretariat.”

He also denied blocking an OPCW visit

As for the OPCW’s findings he said, “We reject any baseless accusations that rely on erroneous information and any attempts to jump into conclusions based on misinterpretations and probabilities without relying on accurate physical evidence”.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

close