News

Sean Hannity of Fox News asked to co-operate in January 6th inquiry



The House of Representatives committee investigating the January 6th attack on the US Capitol in Washington has requested that Sean Hannity, the star Fox News host, respond to questions about his communications with former president Donald Trump and his staff in the days surrounding the riot.

In a letter on Tuesday, the committee asked for Hannity’s voluntary co-operation, meaning that the host has not received a formal subpoena. The letter detailed a series of text messages between the conservative media star and senior officials in the Trump White House, illustrating Hannity’s unusually elevated role as an outside adviser to the administration.

The texts suggest that Hannity was aware of, and deeply concerned about, what Trump was planning for January 6th, and bracing for a possible mass resignation of top White House lawyers as a result.

“We can’t lose the entire WH counsels office,” Hannity wrote to Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, in a December 31st, 2020, text message that the committee included in its letter. “I do NOT see January 6 happening the way he is being told.”

They also indicate that the Fox News host, a longtime confidant of the former president, had knowledge of a flurry of high-level conversations at the White House, involving Mr Trump himself, about leaning on vice-president Mike Pence to use his ceremonial role in Congress’s official electoral count to keep Mr Trump in office.

“Pence pressure,” Hannity wrote in a January 5th message. “WH counsel will leave.” The texts were included in a trove of 9,000 pages of documents Mr Meadows turned over to the panel in response to a subpoena.

As Mr Trump grappled with the political fallout of the attack – including a looming impeachment inquiry and rebukes from some top Republicans – Hannity wrote on January 10th to Mr Meadows and representative Jim Jordan, a key ally.

“He can’t mention the election again. Ever,” Hannity said in the message, referring to Mr Trump. “I did not have a good call with him today. And worse, I’m not sure what is left to do or say, and I don’t like not knowing if it’s truly understood. Ideas?”

A lawyer for Hannity, Jay Sekulow, said on Tuesday that the committee’s request “would raise serious constitutional issues including First Amendment concerns regarding freedom of the press”. Fox News referred inquiries to Mr Sekulow’s statement.

The letter from the committee informed Hannity that it believed the Fox News host “had advance knowledge regarding President Trump’s and his legal team’s planning for Jan. 6”, calling him “a fact witness in our investigation”.

The committee wrote that it had obtained “dozens of text messages” between Hannity and members of Mr Trump’s inner circle, including a note on January 5th in which Hannity expressed concern about the next day’s counting of electoral college votes.

“I’m very worried about the next 48 hours,” Hannity wrote.

Hannity was one of several Fox News stars who became informal confidants to Mr Trump over the course of his administration, frequently conversing with the president by telephone and over meals in the White House.

Last month, the committee revealed that Hannity had contacted Mr Meadows on January 6th as rioters overtook the Capitol, asking: “Can he make a statement? Ask people to leave the Capitol.” Fox News stars Laura Ingraham and Brian Kilmeade sent similar notes asking that Mr Trump take steps to quell the violence.

In Fox News prime time January 6th, Hannity told his viewers that “all of today’s perpetrators must be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law”, adding: “Every good and decent American, we know, will and must condemn what happened at the Capitol.”

A spokesman for the committee declined to say on Tuesday if additional Fox News hosts would be asked to answer questions. Hannity is the most prominent media star it has contacted about testifying. It previously issued a subpoena for Infowars host Alex Jones, who has sued the committee to try to stonewall the investigation. – This article originally appeared in The New York Times



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

close